Question about VTISP Reviews

[jmskelso]

jmskelso wrote:

post removed. We got from your previous posts that you don't like this ISP; there is no need to rehash the same info over and over and over. plodr

So, it is your intention to let no negative posts remain about bad service for any longer than you prescribe as serves your advertisers. So this isn't really a free reveiw. So if your review isn't a positive review, you make sure it gets buried by those you want showing to get paid?

I should have anticipated that from you. So much for freedom here, huh?

[blsJason]

jmskelso, the other moderator felt your post didn't provide any additional information from your previous posts:
 http://www.freedomlist.com/forum/search.ph...r=jmskelso  

Also, your posts are in the ISP reviews section - it only takes one post in the review thread for that ISP to state that you felt you did not get good service from the provider in question - it's not necessary to repeat the same information over and over. If, however, you'd like to discuss an ISP's service, you're more then welcome to either join an already existing thread in the $10 and under section, or start a new thread there.

VTISP is not an advertiser on Freedomlist - Freedomlist does however run Google ads - there's an option to turn them off in your profile (as I have, since the ads loading in a separate frame crashed previous versions of my browser). Maybe VTISP advertises through them, but otherwise Freedomlist doesn't accept payment to be listed on the site, and the ISP information/lists themselves are maintained by other Freedomlist administrators - not the ISP.

If you're concerned that more reviews of a particular ISP are positive rather than negative, perhaps:
1. There are more satisfied customers then there are unsatisfied.
2. Those who are satisfied are more likely to post than those that are unsatisfied.
3. Those who are unsatisfied didn't find VTISP through this site, or didn't post a review here.
4. More of those who are satisfied decided to post a review here.

I can understand why people question moderation actions based on the name of the website. To answer that question, I will provide a link to a post the Webmaster wrote to resolve a previous issue, which mentions how the name of the website was selected. It is worth mentioning the blurb about the hosting is no longer accurate - and hasn't been for a few years - as the company mentioned is now out of business:
 http://www.freedomlist.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=55364#55364  

Thank you for your cooperation, consideration, and understanding.
_________________
Poetworld subscriber 2002-2012.
Don't buy Clearwire!